MikeRox said:
I prefered the Gamecube to the PS2 so yeah, I stand by that logic. Persona 4 > Fire Emblem. Nothing can > SM3DW so 3DS gets that, I can't think what loz is, but Pokemon doesn't interest me in the slightest (that series hasn't interested me since the GBA). But again, one system has sold like 30m units, one system came out a year later, and has barely scraped 5m. The Vita has more higher rated games than the 3DS now despite this (though the best 3DS games outnumber the best rated Vita games). If 3DS lineup was half as good as the Gamecube's, I'd be perfectly happy, but it's been incredibly underwhelming for me. As for knowing nothing about gaming. LOL Just sold my SNES games this last week, highlights included Chrono Trigger, Contra 3, CastleVania 4, Yoshi's Island. Have also owned a complete Dreamcast set etc. Sadly, due to changing life circumstances and my fiancee being more important, these treasures have had to be sold along with hundreds of other games. I'd wager your gaming experience is a fraction of mine, which would explain why you have such a limited knowledge regarding the 3DS vs Vita. |
im not comparing vita vs 3ds games cuz like i said i cant compare 2 things i didnt experience, just cuz you dont like something means its bad, also there are alot of nintendo hating reviewers out there so i dont care for meta, even if fire emblem has a high score (i think 91 or 92). LoZ is zelda
also point being ratio is more likely to be better on a less sold product. DS and PS2 dont have a 25% attach ratio game right? Vita does, 3DS does, WiiU does.
Vita has its own games and 3ds as well. But to compare an entire library is stupid especially if both have great games on both. if you like vita more cool, good 4U. no matter wat games come out for 3ds, vita will be your number 1 choice for obvious reason.
