bobgamer said:
Assuming i don't accept my bias sure is rich (hint: i do). And i would even ask you to explain where in my post i refused to see the pro's in MS's offerings, i asked for a source (which you conveniently didn't give) and said that quality is a matter of opinion. You disagree with this? My silence? I didn't know that posting=silence. The more you know i guess. And we could turn this into a discussion of the burden of proof but we are not going there, right? If it's so common sense, please enlighten me (i am serious). Common sense is usually not so hard to prove since it's so, you know, common. |
I directed you to metacritic. Personally I don't feel to look at the top 100 meta scores of 360 and PS3, filter out XBLA and PSN games, prove to you that XBLA has more critically acclaimed quality (you allready know XBLA has more in quantity).....only for you to say "its just an opinion". lol. But I know its there and XBLA has better games and you are more then welcome to go there, since its public access and open to everyone.
And again, Xbox indie channel has literally hundreds more games then PS minies.
So your origional mega LOLOLOLOL comment to the OP claiming Xbox indie superiority, is largely baseless. You laugh was a lie!








