| Gballzack said: Look at the list of sites Metacritic uses... They're all pro-Sony. Seriously, just look at the list. I've seen this exact same argument used before on other forums and each and every time its been called out on the basis that it uses Metacritic as a source. Face it, the closest thing you're going to ever get to an objective source is the game sales. An honestly if the Quality over Quantity argument didn't work for the N64 and GC, why do you think its going to work for the PS3 and PSP? Shame on you Davygee, shame on you, you should have known better than to try something like this. |
Pro-sony? You are really clutching at straws here. Shame on you!
So sources like: Xbox Evolved, Maxim (Men's magazine),IGN, GameZone, Gamespot, Edge Magazine, and The New York Times are pro Sony in your view?
Sony must own the world in your view. Metacritic is praised as being a very reliable judge of anything from games to movies. Citing the website as pro-sony is absolutely ridiclous.
Here is some praise for the website: http://www.gale.com/servlet/HTMLFileServlet?imprint=9999®ion=7&fileName=reference/archive/200404/metacritic.html
and more:
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/metacritic_reviews.php
