Do you want the Vita to eventually do better than the 3DS?

[outlawauron]

curl-6 said:

outlawauron said:

curl-6 said:

kupomogli said:

The 3DS wasn't dead in the water.  It sold no less than 65,000 a week and that was on its very worst week, but it was usually around 90,000 a week.  "As well as it did" doesn't mean "as well as it's doing now."

65,000 at its worst, with around a 90,000 a week average in comparison to the Vitas 30,000-35,000 average after it went to 199 yen in Japan.  Crazy that people would buy a system with hardly anything worthwhile on it and completely avoid a system with a solid library of  titles.

Consumers obviously don't agree with your definition of a solid library.

Just as we know quality has very little to do with sales, there's not much coorelation between a library and its sales.

... seriously?

Software sells hardware, that's one of the core truths of the industry. If consumers found the Vita's library desirable, they wouldn't be shunning it.

You kind of made my point with your own post. Because quality =/= sales, there's a difference between desirable games and good games. Most good games have mass appeal, but there a lot that do not.