Dr.Grass said:
You're statement is in-effect saying that all companies are the same (since all companies seek profit). That's utter BS. Is there no underlying ethos in any company that could differentiate it from another? Does the CEO and Governing Board not have the will and right to impose their desires on a company? Is there no fundamental difference between a Japanese company and a American one? Are the two exactly the same!? BS. Some companies are worse at offering good products and better at ensuring success despite a poorer product. Manipulation exists. We have a right to abandon a company due to a poor track record. And since 2009/10, the 360 has been lightyears behind the PS3 in terms of offering what was promised. They had an awesome launch period - that's that. And I am completely justified in using that track record to form my opinion of the brand they've been building. And don't come and "dr" me. Your cynicism is well and duly noted. I've had that nickname since I was 16, and I'm applying for a PhD scholarship as we speak. What are you trying to do? My mind is well and truly open. If you knew me in real life you'd be aware of this. |
So you admit you behave different in real life and online? Why? And don't call someone talking bullshit, where is your education?
I don't see any difference in greed between Sony and MS. Your attempt to turn this into a 360-ps3-discussion is noted but again, perhaps you get it this time, we are talking about companies. Both have a lot of products and both want to earn money with them. Both also have perhaps technical solutions I would've decided otherwise because it costs customers more than you would have to pay if you'd buy an alternate product.