By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Jaywood2010 on 10 August 2013
Edit Thread
Xxain said:
JayWood2010 said:


Megaman(Capcom), Sonic(SEGA AKA Mario Killer), and Snake(Kojima with a bigger community on Sony consoles) had a proper history with Nintendo?

The reason people want Goku is because Capcom is working on the game which has a history with one of the all time most popular characters that is Goku.  It is only natural that people want a popular character in a game they love.


Stop. Megaman began life on Nintendo consoles. Megaman 1-7, Megaman X 1-3, Megaman Battle network 1-6, Megaman Zero 1-4, Megaman ZX 1-2, Megaman legends, Megaman soccer, Megaman 1-5 GB, Megaman Command Missions... were/still Are exclusive to Nintendo consoles. Are you serious?. Sonic being Mario's ultimate rival indirectly links him to Nintendo's history. You cant talk about SNES&SEGA age with Mario and Sonic. Plus Sonic Advance 1-3, Sonic Adventure 1-2, Sonic heroes, Sonic Rush 1-2,Shadow, secret rings, black knight, unleashed, colors, upcoming Lost world. Sonic has been aligned with Nintendo consoles since being 3rd. At this point Sonic and Mario are nearly Nintendo characters. I dont want it to fully happen of course but it would not be shocking if it did.


Stop?  Did I start something?  You said a proper history right?  Smash Bros is known to have first party characters in their games which none of these characters are.  In some cases they have missed games on a nintendo console completely (Especially Sonic and Snake) and I wouldn't really call that a "Proper History."

And you can say Goku is not a video game character but then again Dragon Ball has over 80 games that has been made and 37 million copies sold.  Something that the majority of Smash Bros characters can't say.  Kind of sounds like a video game character to me.  That is like saying Batman Arkham Asylum is not a video game because batman appeared in comic books and movies as well.

Now I'm fine with you saying you don't like the idea of them being in the game or that people need to shutup about them, but to say 0% for characters without a "proper history" when Nintendo seems to be giving a few a little airtime themselves while also partnering with Capcom(EDIT: Namco Bandai) to make the new smash bros.

Don't tell me to stop either.  Just because you disagree with me does not mean that you should tell me to stop(Only made one comment).  I appreciate you using exclusive examples but my "opinion" on "proper history" has not changed.