RolStoppable said:
JoeTheBro said:
There is a huge difference with what the Vita is advertized to do with PS4 and the GBA/GameCube generation. I don't imagnine a lot of people owning a PS4 and thinking "Hey I love these games, I should buy that other PlayStation for its games." Instead people owning a PS4 will think "Hey, I love these games, I should buy that other PlayStation so I can play them more".
You have a Wii U correct? Isn't it great just playing on the gamepad and not even bothering with the tv? This off screen play is something that almost all of us Nintendo fans agree is really sweet. If the gamepad was sold separately for $100 and worked anywhere there was internet, do you not imagine it still getting a decent amount of sales with people wanting that off tv experience? If the answer is yes, then what's different about the Vita with remote play?
|
The problem with that line of thought is that no self-respecting twenty-something is going to play a Vita in public. He's too old for that.
|
Only in America. In Europe PlayStation is cool and Japan is well, Japan.
Also remote play is still great within the privacy of your home. No one needs to know ;)
Mr Khan said:
Because generally people don't think that way. Much like the gamepad, it's an idea that sounds like something people would like, but ultimately not particularly compelling (enough to make the investment, anyway)
|
Well we'll just have to disagree. From my experience and everything I've heard from others, off tv play is the best feature of the Wii U. When it is integrated and works seamlessly with every game, this seems to be a killer app.
