By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Vetteman94 said:

I have been asking myself the same question for each of your replies to me. 

Even now Mario isnt as relevant as he used to be, I would argue that currently Pikachu is more recognized specifically for the under 13 crowd .  Maybe 10 years ago it was Mario.  

And they way they did the poll was they showed gamings most iconic characters.  And you had to select the ones you recoginized.  Pretty simple poll.  Don't see how there could be much in the way of bias.  But if thats how you want to discredit it.  


I have seen your replies and I can see where you are coming from and THIS is the ONLY post that I seem to have a issue with.

Only because you say Pac-man is the most recognizable character.

But in this post you say that you feel that Pikachu is more recognized than even Mario due to Mario not being as relevant as Pikachu is now. Yet Pacman really hasn't been "relevant" in like over 20 or 30 years. I guess I am confused because you say Mario is not as relevant as he was 10 years ago and has been surpassed by Pikachu so that makes Pikachu more recognizable. Yet Pacman is who has not been relevant in over 20 years is more recognizable than both. It is like you are contradicting yourself here.

Other than that good points!



The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence...

PSN: StlUzumaki23