By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
killerzX on 01 August 2013
Edit Thread
sales2099 said:
Mmmfishtacos said:
sales2099 said:
 

Trying? Its fact that Xbox was better built and more reliable then PS2. It wasn't a huge gap like 360 to PS3, but it was clear Xbox was the winner that gen in that regard.

If you refuse to see that for what it is, then you are in your own bubble im afraid. Again, try to be openly aware of your own bias, but try not to use said bias to skew actual history.


Show me this "fact".

That is honestly your response?

Im sorry i don't have a spreadsheet handy. It is just a general consensus of that time. Xbox generally didn't fail. PS2 had a disc read problem. It was nowehere close to 360 failure rates compared to the PS3 YLOD, but it was generally accepted that the Xbox was just a solid machine.

You are welcome to play the "If you don't provide a works cited page from at least 6 historically accurate scholary logs then I don't believe you" then fine. It just goes to show the differences between a fan that embraces who he is, and those who are oblivious to it.

Xbox was more reliable then PS2 but PS3 was way more reliable then 360. AT least take comfort in that your example happened much more recently then mine. MS certainly has a lot to prove with X1 reliability, but don't assume they ALWAYS had a bad track record with Xbox consoles. Far from it.

for the first time in my life, i think i have to agree with sales on this one