Xen on 31 July 2013
| Dunban67 said: Xen 1 minute ago: says "Nintendo however, is not the only one to blame for lack of 3rd party support for the Wii U. Many companies simply don't want to support it. ' Dunban67 says: Do you seriously think Companies "simply don t want to support" the Wii U for no good reason but they DO want to support MSFT and Sony "for no good reason? How can anyone think that- They don t support the wii u because they either have or will lose money doing so to date- when and if they think it is worth their investment, then they will support it- that time may not come however- we will just have to wait and see- Companies don t "simply" do or not do anything- they may not always make the right decisions but their decisions are based on a return on their investment |
Yeah.
Otherwise how would you explain gimped versions of games and a bunch of market "test games" earlier? They are not entirely commited. When they are, you get stuff like Monster Hunter Tri. Good game, sold well. When you have no product, you can't sell product. There are exceptions, but that's the majority case. The "worth it" vs "not worth it" argument doesn't hold up well, given that the Wii U is quite easy to port to from the 360, as devs say.
Most recent example of a gimped version is the Wii U version of the new Batman AC game. Online for PS360, none for Wii U.
