Is the Wii U a failure in concept or execution?

[Aquietguy]

darkknightkryta said:

Aquietguy said:

There's a big difference in having to constantly pause and just simply glancing down. Plus navigating menus is faster with a pad. You touch the screen where you need to rather than having move a curser with an analog to get there. So with the pad you glance down, touch what you need to, then glance back at the screen. What a controller you have to pause, navigate the cursor which is not nearly as fast as just touching, then unpause. And you say the pad is worse. 

There is, pausing is faster. 

I already mentioned touch/stylist based control is good, I also said this was utilized by the Wii-mote, the pad isn't necessary.

When did the Wii mote have a touch screen? I laid out the basics between the two and clearly the pad is faster. There's more to it than just pressing pause but if you think pausing is faster then that's on you. The person using the pad has to be really slow or new to the pad to be slower.