Has anyone ever thought of this... maybe its a good thing Wii U had a rough first year?

[NightDragon83]

happydolphin said:

oniyide said:

if that were the case why did sony, MS AND NINTY put motion controls on the backburner, clearly they dont see it as the evolution of nothing. Graphics always evolve and is part of the evolution anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool IMHO otherwise we still would be playing 16 bit 2d games. touch controls are here to stay. 

THe last sentence is just pathetically wrong, Sony beat Ninty twice in the row with two systems that had weaker graphics.

1) Did I say motion controls? I said value add such as the wiimote and the padlet.

2) Sorry, but the PSX didn't have weaker graphics. It could pump out more polygons, had better 2D support and full FMV support. All gimmicks, but they all gave Sony an edge. And I did say last gen also.