By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
happydolphin said:
MDMAlliance said:

It's a bit funny that your sources come from some site called creation.com 

Also, I actually do think the bold 1 and 2 are correct to the extent that your links talk about the Bible itself while Creationism belongs to the people and many of them did believe those things.  Just saying.

What is funny about that? If you want to talk about the tenest of creationism, how does it not make sense to pull references from the major creationist outlet in the world?

@2. It's possible. Like evolution changed its tuned many times in the past, so has creation. It's based on scientific findings after all.


It's funny because for arguments like this you usually would want to stray away from sources that obviously would be biased towards the topic at hand, and use other sources in addition for credibility.

For the second part, it was mostly for arguments sake, because the bolded was in past tense.  Therefore, it was definitely (at some point) true.