By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
keroncoward said:


I will ask again is Trayvon's unrelated past evidence that he started the altecation? Also Trayvon tried to get a gun....the other guy had one that he deliberately stalked a kid with on him. Zimmerman is no saint but for some reason you want to paint a picture that he was innocent and never did violent things in his past. If Trayvon's unrelated past is evidence then Zimmerman's unrelated past should also be evidence.

Yes it is. It speaks about his character and personalty but fuck lets try to sweep that under the rug and act like a person like that would NEVER put himself in a position to be shot. There is a difference between obtaining one illegally like Trayvon who didn't have a permit and couldn't even get one if he wanted to try to legally obtain one and Zimmerman who was following the law carrying a gun. Its irrelevant that Zimmerman had a gun. Millions of people are carrying a gun on a daily basis. Many people you walk by have guns on them or in their car. And Trayvon wasn't stalked... or you know what? The prosecution would have gotten the 3rd charge they were seeking into consideration. (But since you didn't follow the case you wouldn't know that).  They were seeking 3rd charge that said if another crime (AKA stalking) were in process when he killed trayvon then Zimmerman would be charged with said crime. But prosecution didn't even argue that he was stalking Trayvon. They argued he was violating "child abuse" laws. It was so ridiculous the judge didn't allow it