| DD_Bwest said: wow you need to go back and look at how the evidence in the trial got handled. Zimmermans defense didnt get vast portions of it until just before the trial, and had to send requests over and over for it. The entire way they got the run around and the judge allowed character information about zimmerman, but said anything about TM was off limits. He was getting off via appeal no matter what for how bias the judge was. There was no evidence at all that shows zimmerman starting the altercation. The 911 operator didnt say stay in,they said "we dont need you to" as he was already out of the damn car. and by "they always get away" was the string of burglaries that no one was caught for. The cops never charged him because when they arrived on scene they used their experience and training to determine it was self defense. lets go through step by step, TM walks home from the store. Not a crime. GZ sees him and thinks is suspicious so calls police. Not a crime. GZ gets out of the car to give police more information. Not a crime. TM attacks GZ and smashes his skull into a concrete side walk. This is aggravated assualt. GZ shoots TM. Thats called self defense. TM wasnt some young kid, he was an aging teenager. and When i was an aging teenager, i know i hell of alot of kids at school who would attack someone older. he was taller then GZ and in better shape, and had bragged about being a good fighter. GZ's personal trainer called GZ a little bitch |
The prosecutor was so bad he might be disbarred with the way he handled the evidence. (because thats the only possible way he had a sliver of a chance to get a conviction)
