Zero999 said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Objectively, no. I think you're referring to art style not graphics. Mario Galaxy graphics are slightly above last gen graphics. Their art style is a slightly more mature in color palette and lighting in its jump from Mario Sunshine. Seriously, it wasnt that big of a jump from Gamecube to Wii, which is why Zelda: Twilight Princess could be played on the GC as well as the Wii with not such a huge difference. PS2 to PS3 or Xbox to Xbox 360 were much greater in differential graphics. NIntendo is basically playing the slightly above current gen graphics game again. They wont win a graphics war against anyone. Art style....probably, yes...thats all they've got. That and even if Nintendo had the best graphically capable console they would leave third parties to make the majorly mature graphically intensive games, they wont do it themselves.
|
I'm refering to final results, not art style. and you clearly don't know what "graphics" or "best" means. virtually every ps360 title is more demanding than mario galaxy in term of graphics, but mario galaxy graphics are the best, simple as that.
|
Just like your name, that technically makes zero sense. Nintendo during the GC era had better graphics than the PS2, but not the Xbox but very few graphics intensive games outside of the Resident Evil ports and Zelda: Twilight Princess and the Metroid games.
