By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
attaboy said:
wilco said:
Supermans recklessness is not really the issue. The movie is just too excessive with the damage that is done to metropolis. Its just disaster porn at its worst.

I'm completely fine with Superman punching people into buildings and doing millions in property damage, but usually even in the cartoons, you don't get the sense that much collateral damage is being done. Even in Avengers, a couple buildings got smashed up, but you could walk away from that movie believing that the bodycount was relatively low. In MoS, there is noway that 1000's of people didn't die. Thats just depressing.

One thing that could have remedied this is if we would have seen atleast a couple scenes of superman actually... you know... being a superhero. Save a couple people from falling debris, rescue some people from falling off a building... etc. We never got that, all superman did was punch people in the face.


Enjoy!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hq3AO6FWw3o


Yes I've seen that clip. It proves my point.

The property damage in that clip absolutely PALES in comparison to MoS. They knocked down one measily building there. MoS damn near destroys the entire city.

Again, I never said I had a problem with superman doing property damage. Pretty much all superpowered heros do that. I just think the amount of property damage and innocent lives being destroyed in MoS was WAAAAAY over the top. It got downright obnoxious after a while, to the point that I was numb to it. Its never good when an entire city block being leveled feels boring.