Girl Gamer Elite said:
I don't like the PS3 because it was a clumsy arrogant and awkward product forced onto the market three to five years before it was economically viable. Forced Blu-Ray on any PS3 consumer increasing the price tag exponentially. And since then has offered many games either ruined by the pitiful six-axis, ridden with glitches due to poor programming, that look better on the 360 or require loading large chunks of data onto the HDD. Not to mention the PS3 has all but abandoned Backwards Compatibility and even when it did have it, the system required firmware updates to make it work right and adaptors to use memory cards and other accessories. Let's also not forget "Rumble" being last gen, yet now they somehow miraculously find a way to include it but at the same time not bundle it with the console. |
I have a different viewpoint. I love new technology and feel Sony is the only one giving us the future. To my knowledge there is only one game ruined by sixxaxis and that was Lair and they are fixing it. :) Look at how many Wii games have been ruined by "waggle". The poor programming is the 3rd parties fault (EA). Backwards compatibility is not dead. There are rumors going around the PS forums that it will be available for download on PSN for the current 40gb owners in the near future. You do not need an adapter to use memory cards on your PS3, only to transfer data from your PS2 memory card. Rumble wasn't included because of liscensing problems. Sony did lie about that one though, they made an excuse to cover it up. I will get to my point, Sony has been a bit dishonest in some areas regarding the PS3. But I believe it was necessary for them to give us a system that is as future proof as possible.
