Superman would never be as reckless as in MoS?

[HikenNoAce]

The Fury said:

HikenNoAce said:

Dude, people aren't happy with the movie because it was bad. Besides the fact that that character had nothing to do with Superman, there were pacing issues and plot issues. Why was Lois Lane on the spaceship? Why was the Jor-El ghost omniscient? How did the other Kryptonians become so strong so quickly when it took Clark years of being exposed to the yellow sun? Why was Zod trying to turn Earth into Krypton? And why the hell were they constantly going back to the Daily Planet staff during the climax?

I didn't like it that much, you have to look past  somethings and just enjoy it for the action film it is. Lois Lane was on the ship as collateral. Jor-El on the ship was equivilent to advanced AI which had access to the ships systems, including security cameras (question should be where he disappeared to after Superman left the ship).

Yeah the other bits though, no idea. Add, why did the teraforming machine know Superman was attacking it and know it was under threat.... heck why did it even have defence mechanisms?

No movie is perfect but some should just be enjoyed.

It is hard for me to completely switch off my brain though. If something stupid is happening on screen, that will bother you, right?

Lois was on the ship as collateral for what? Why did they need collateral? She was just on the spaceship because otherwise she wouldn't appear in the movie in the second half.

Advanced AI can see the future too now? Like when she told Lois to move her head to the right?

And even if we manage somehow to look past the plot holes and get over the slow pace of the first, I, personally, got bored of watching the same action sequence for the last quarter of the movie. How many times can we get excited looking at a guy getting punched through a building?

Someone should post that review that highlights everything that was wrong with the movie. It's a youtube video with 3 guys doing a sketch first.