By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MDMAlliance said:
ganoncrotch said:
Azzanation said:

3DS is cheaper and there library is alot bigger with better quality games. If Vita was cheaper im sure people will consider it but it will hurt Sony more as there not in any shape to lower costs.


http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sony-PlayStation-Vita-Wi-Fi-only/dp/B0054Q82WI/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1374469172&sr=8-1&keywords=playstation+vita

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Nintendo-Handheld-Console-3DS-XL/dp/B008DS4MEQ/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1374469139&sr=8-2&keywords=3ds+xl

 

I don't think £5 is really that much a difference now, not to the point where it would put you off getting the system if some of these games in OPs list really hit the spot for you, hence this thread.


In the United States, a Vita costs $250, a 3DS XL costs $200, and a regular 3DS costs $170.  An SD card is relatively cheap, while PS Vita memory cards are several times more expensive than SD cards holding the same amount of memory.  I may not think he should have said that, but you're using some biased examples.

I'm using Biased examples of what they cost here in the EU from amazon? if they are a different price in bestbuy or so in the states it takes maybe 2 mins to to to their stores site and grab 2 links for the systems to show the difference otherwise it's just what people think the difference is, and it really isn't as much as people think anymore.

 

edit - best buys site is actually god awful and the prices are exactly as you said, 200 for the xl and 250 for the wifi vita sorry for not believing you.



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive