By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
walsufnir on 20 July 2013
Edit Thread
Mmmfishtacos said:
Nsanity said:
KingdomHeartsFan said:
walsufnir said:
KingdomHeartsFan said:

From the screenshots DriveClub looks better


which exactly? but generally a 30fps game should *always* look better than a 60fps game, of course, in pics.


Honeslty from the pics in the first post it looks like Driveclub has more detail in its cars and environments, but tbh it looks like Forza has more interesting environments, but that is probably because Driveclub didn't show its most interesting maps yet.  Also I think a 30fps game should only look better than a 60fps game if they are using the full potental of the hardware.  Since these are launch titles I highly doubt that so I think one could be 60fps and still look better if it is a more demanding game.

Have you read this? http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=628511

What does people trashing unfinished code have to do with anything? What they showed in the Reveal trailer was in game footage. Much like what Forza did. And if you read that thread from gaf you would have understood that. Plus everything is dynamic, from time of day to weather, to sea level changes. Drive club is not only better looking but technology wise it’s more impressive.


First: It *should* look at least better because it's running on *way* better hardware (given by "experts") and it only renders at 30fps. Technology-wise impressive? This would be too much in this post in this thread but believe me, everything that we see today is somehow prekaked. Devs are fooling us intentionally since ever to make things look like they do.

Would you consider the AI of Last of Us to be bad? Still, top-notch AI (which no console is capable of nowadays and they won't this gen) isn't even better than a 4 year old child. Welcome to gaming industry.