S.T.A.G.E. on 16 July 2013
| Angelus said: This is a pretty convenient list isn't it? Leaves off several years of the life cycle (years in which the PS3 had almost nothing, and most of it was trash), and doesn't list MS console exclusives that eventually found their way to PC either. You add all those in, and that list looks a lot different. In the end it comes down to what you like. PS has a lot of variety, I give them credit for that, but the fact is there isn't a game on that list I would enjoy playing more than Halo, Gears, or Forza. That seems to be something a lot of PS fanboys don't understand. I always hear "that's all you've got!" Maybe they should stop to consider that those games are a hell of a lot of fun. |
Dude....really? During the first initial years of the PS3, MS had scooped up a bunch of timed exclusives and third party exclusives from PC and other third parties that had nothing to do with first party. Sony was busy building up their first party and had a drought only for two years. MS has had a longer drought than Sony. In 2008 Sony came back. Also, who said Sonys games should be enjoyed more than Halo, Gears or Forza? If you're a gamer, play good games, thats all. MS just pumps out less of them internally than Sony because Sony takes risk and tries. This is the point, this is the purpose.
