who has the better first party/publishing strategy from Nintendo, Sony and MS?

[bananaking21]

MDMAlliance said:

Weedlab said:
Sony! They have a diversity of titles and they're supporting both major platforms with good measure. The PS3 is still receiving good support and as Cerny said in a recent interview the first year of the PS4 is all about the core games. Let's not forget the strong relations Sony have cultivated with indies. Nintendo don't seem to be making the right moves in my view. They're getting better but as it stands they seem to be behind the curve. Microsoft's plan on paper doesn't seem bad either. I get the sense both Sony and Microsoft will provide a diversity of games consistently. Plus, Microsoft is locking down exclusive content such as timed DLC (though I do not care for this much, but some do).

With that said, I rank them as follows

1 Sony
2 Microsoft
3 Nintendo

I thought this was about 1st party stuff.  Meaning games made by Sony/Microsoft/Nintendo (studios owned by them).

games published by them as well. or exlusives secured. beyonetta, gears arent owned by nintend and MS but they are included in this. out of Forza and halo microsofts first party lineup is pretty much a joke, but they secure 3rd party exlusives like gears to make things better