By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Slimebeast said:
TheBlackNaruto said:

Again I agree with Soundwave.

And seriously Slimebeast him being a teenage boy is really irrelevant ANY NORMAL person would feel threated if someone did the things ZImmerman did. It is not so much teach him a lesson it is more so not knowing what a stranger that has been following you in their car ADN that got out of the car to come find you was going to do. That would make any sane person feel thereatened easily(IMO that is anyway). And we don't have evidence that Zimmerman grabbed him because we only have Zimmerman to give his side of the stroy. And he is definitely not going to say he grabbed him because that would change A LOT of what actually happened.

Again just a sad case that could have been easily avoided.

I can see either scenario being true. Trevyon not feeling particularly threatened, but more like a cocky young confident man with strong integrity feeling insulted by someone checking him out.

I can also see Trevyon feel threatened and uncomfortable about an unknown man tracking him.

But in either case, if he attacked first and got on top and mauled Zimmerman it doesn't matter much. It was wrong of him to fight.

I agree it's a sad case. I agree Zimmerman made a bad decision by following Trevyon so resolutely. And yeah, possibly Zimmerman was the one who grabbed first but we have no way of knowing. Personally I believe in his account, but I don't think it's unreasonable by anyone to suspect that Zimmerman was the one who grabbed the young man first. But we just don't know, the court could not know.

I can agree with that!



The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence...

PSN: StlUzumaki23