I have to go to work. But so far almost everyone I have come across who sides with trayvon says he was stalked and a boy which both claims are factually incorrect and I can't take these people serious at that point. Also, when it comes to them meeting face to face they either claim no one knows what happened at that point or for some reason Zimmerman was the aggressor... which no evidence suggests that. In fact, the evidence suggests that Trayvon was the aggressor. And no one knows what happened? Well yeah, his name is Zimmerman. Why should we take his word for it? We shouldn't. We should do what the defenses ME did and look at his statement and see if the evidence verifies it. And it does. He was telling the truth about following someone. About shooting someone. About calling out for help. About getting attacked. About losing someone. But we should assume he wasn't telling the truth about the start of the conflict? Doesn't make sense.
I fully believe Trayvon was the aggressor. He had bruising under his knuckles and Zimmerman had injuries. The only part I don't believe about Zimmermans story is when he said trayvon said you are going to die tonight. Take that out and I still believe Zimmerman should have shot Trayvon.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
