JakDaSnack said:
I said games get lower because they simply aren't as good games. Up until your last post, you failed to acknowledge that both galaxy games are scored higher on gamerankings, nor did you acknowledge that I averaged them both to determine that galaxy 1 is the highest ranked game of this gen. You claimed that mario galaxy has the same story, which is correct, but you fail to understand that It's gameplay overcomes it's lack of story, just like how TLOU's story overcomes it's lack of interesting gameplay. You are correct that Quarter to 3 generally scores the opposite direction, but you failed to acknowledge that even without that score TLOU would still be ranked lower than both mario galaxy games. That's where you go wrong, you lost the argument, and if calling you a fanboy when you clearly are acting like one isn't tolerated, then so be it. You have clearly lost this argument, |
No, you said they are scored lower because they stop innovating or a better way to put it is can't innovate enough because the competition already had the whole gen to come up with different ways. That in no way disproves what I said that games do get scored lower at the end of the gen so you didn't disprove that at all but instead just agreed with me. +1 for me. Are you really saying because I didn't say Mario galaxy was higher on gamerankings at first means I didn't aknowledge it? What a stupid and childing reason, I simply stated Grand theft auto is rated higher and it is above both on metacritic and that defeats your purpose on saying it is game of the gen from the reviews. At least you can see the story is the same but you can't really get out of that one by saying TLOU doesn't have interesting gameplay but Mario galaxy does, that is an opinion and not fact like the same story. Another +1 for me. I am also right about Quarter to 3. +1 for me again. As for "acknowledge that even without the score TLOU would still be ranked lower than both mario galaxy games", why would I say that if I never said it would, I just stated the Mario galaxy games didn't have to deal with stuff like that and in no way said it would be higher than them if the troll reviews were taken away so +1 for me again. As for the last thing, how did you average the scores? Because as I see it if you average gameranking and metacritic for all 3 games seperately, Grand theft auto still wins, atleast against smg2. Your whole argument has bad reasoning behind it and you didn't provide anything to back up your claims so I still win unless you can actually provide reasons instead of bs.
