Final-Fan said:
Vetteman94 said:
Final-Fan said:
Vetteman94 said:
Final-Fan said:
Vette, why are you refusing to address the points Linkz made about you? |
He only had one question for me, I answered it. The other was for Rol.
|
Let me spell it out for you. Linkz referred to an earlier post of his, http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=5499266 , in which he pointed out a remarkable change of stance which seems suspicious to him. It also seems suspicious to me since to my knowledge you have not addressed this point.
|
Well refering to a post from a few days prior helps when you point out that specific one.
He made a point and I still disagree with it. I understood what I wrote earlier and I still stand by what I said. I didnt come out and say there was nothing that could make me vote today.
I dont see anything to respond to.
|
He linked the post just like I did, so if I am not misinterpreting you, your claim that he didn't adequately specify what he was talking about is laughable.
As for what you could be responding to:
1. Do you still believe that, given what Linkz explained in that post, you did not have a "strong No Lynch stance"?
2. How do you explain your misremembering the reasons for not supporting a lynch on that day? (Forgot you said it was a bad risk)
|
You didnt link the post until you replied to my reply about your question, how the hell am i supposed to know what post you were referring too, especially one from 2 days prior. Just magically read your mind? If you wanted me to address it, you should have linked to it from the start and not be vague about it like you caught me slipping or something.
1. Already answered that in my previous post
2. Already answered that as well
I guess if you can't see that I already answered your questions or his observations, than I dont know what else to tell you. Maybe you are looking for something that isnt there.
