By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
RolStoppable said:
Vetteman94 said:

You just dont like that I have challenged your thinking,  flawed as it is.  But with me out of the way and no one else really saying anything this will allow you to control the pace that you want. 

As if this game had any pace to speak of. Besides, I can control this game regardless of your status. It's not like anyone else was trying to get anything going.

If things were up to you, we would lynch a lurker. Perhaps happyD, because he didn't even have the dignity to post on Day 2 (let's ignore that he is banned which is as waterproof of an excuse as it can get for not posting). You know why I don't like your play? Because in a game with so few players you want to lynch a lurker, but make no efforts whatsoever to get the lurkers to post first. You aren't interested in hearing from them, you just want one of them gone, but aren't willing to make the first step (the vote) yourself.

Exactly, its not like you are trying to get people to participate either, you just voted cause you dont like that I disagreed with your reasoning because I can't give 3 people a pass when none of them are confirmed.  

How can I get a lurker to talk?  Sure I could vote them but its only one vote,  and even in this small of a game that doesnt mean much.  If I really wasnt just interested in hearing from them I would have voted for them and then encouraged others to do the same.  Which I haven't done,  I have just suggested it as a course of action, considering in the past it has been successful many times.   And in the case of HappyD, I didnt see that he was banned,  I made a mistake,  but that doesnt excuse the other 2.