By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Final-Fan said:
Linkzmax said:
Drinkzmax apologizing for my absence so far toDay.

I'll respond to what little has been said properly after work tomorrow, but I must get some sleep now.
But first, Rol can you guess how I figured out you killed Mario?

Oh and radish, thanks for finally posting some stuff that can offer a read. I severly doubt you'd react to Rol as you have if you were scum.

Why haven't you voted Rol? 

I can blame it on the liquor or the fact a vote at that point either wouldn't have carried any weight or would have been seen as me claiming to have information, which I'm not doing. There is no certainty about it, but Rol is the only one who's displayed a reason to kill Mario.

RolStoppable said:
The host restarted the game when only six players were available officially. The reasoning was that there are enough players. This means the likelyhood that one of mujie, prof and nacho is scum is very low. Out of those three, prof was the highest priority to find a replacement for, but that might just be because prof was the first of those three to confirm that he isn't going to play.

This was said just before Day 1 ended, and has recently been restated. There's a big glaring issue with this statement.

supermario128 said:
Good news everyone!

I just got my memory back. Now I can confirm that I am indeed town. I had no idea before. :P

Mario's statement and flip prove that at least his alignment was not not given at the start.

So why kill Mario?
1) It increases the likelyhood of lynching someone in the smaller pool of "could-be-scum".
2) So he can't challenge the assertation made.