By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Torillian on 06 July 2013
Edit Thread
Calmador said:
Torillian said:
I'm surprised by the idea that before Jesus you were "scamming to get girls to sleep with you everyday" (paraphrased). That seems a bit extreme if I'm honest, I mean sure if I was like that I guess I probably would need religion or something and it would make me a better person, but I think you should understand that most people aren't thinking of sex to such an extreme. You make it sound like you could barely function.

In the end though I think that there are some people that over emphasize sex in their lives, but for most of us it's just a fun part of life that doesn't consume my entire being. It's like how I enjoy chocolate, and do so in moderation, but if I was spending everyday eating chocolate for all my meals then yeah I probably shouldn't have any at all.

Everyone needs God, not religion.

Some people... that's a bold faced lie. Look at our culture norms... players are admired. Consider the TV show, "How I met your mothe." If we truly, truly we're a nation that dissapproved of immoral sexual conduct.. if the vast majority of us truly, truly, were as you say we were there would be an outrage and outcry for the behavior of "Barny" an outright player. But, that's not the case is it. We know what the cultural norm is men looking for women for sex. I could go so far as to say that men in general are semi-players who look for the most physcially attractive women to decieve. This is what's average and you say "some."This is a problem. And everyone needs God.

If you're going to try and pass off to me that the majority of men are players who try their best to decieve women into sex then you are going to need more than a popular TV show as proof.  Statistics of any kind would be welcome.  

I disagree, I'm doing just fine being an atheist.  Unless you mean that in some metaphysical sense assuming God as an all powerful being so noone would be anything without him, but that's an argument that assumes too much in the first place.  



...