archbrix said:
I used my last post as an example because it was the most recent. My very second post in the thread addressed both of your points (why a hundred dollar drop right now is too much and why fifty would suffice) that you wrongfully accused me of lying about not ignoring later: "They were selling the 3DS for a profit at $250 so when they cut the price by $80 it resulted in a (relatively) small loss per unit. The WiiU was already selling at a loss shortly after launch. It was stated that after selling a game with the system (probably a 1st party game at that) it turned a profit. By the end of the year I wouldn't be surprised if the BOM was down enough that they were breaking even with each system sold - but a price drop is going to put them in the red again. So if they drop the deluxe down to $300 (a full $100 less than the PS4) with a strong holiday lineup, they'll be moving plenty of units and not fall as deeply into the red. Remember, we're talking about Nintendo here." Respectfully, perhaps you should brush up on your reading comprehension? This is also evident in your new post as it is just restating the same things I've already addressed as to why they don't make sense, so I'll just assume that's your silent way of saying "agree to disagree". |
Okay fine, you weren't lying, so how about we move on now? And yes I am repeating myself just like I said I would be if we kept going on, as you haven't disproven what I said/I'm not sure if you're grasping what I'm getting at. When I say agree to disagree is when I mean agree to disagree, though I can't see how you can reasonably disagree with much of what I said as many facts and past instances are involved.








