George Zimmerman Trial

[S.T.A.G.E.]

silentdj151 said:

killerzX said:

i swear if this has got to be like the 10 person in this thread alone to just ignore the facts of this case. thats not what happened at all.

lets see, zimmerman is legally allowed to possess a weapon, he was suspicous of an unkown, shady looking person, in a place where there has been a rash of crime, then after loosing track of martin, martin then confronted zimmerman and proceeded to smash zimmermans head into the pavement, to which zimmerman responded by shooting his assailant. 

all the evidence is pointing to zimmerman not committing any crime

all the evidence is pointing to zimmerman not committing any crime

Yeah sure buddy...with all those interviews he has given...how many times can Zimmerman contradict himself...points to guilt when someone can't keep a straight story

The problem with Zimmermans case is that he isn't majorly contradicting himself in interviews. His friends book and testimony were a big spoke in the wheel of Zimmermans eeriely clean testimony. Even the detective, Serino said either the guy is telling the truth or hes a pathalogical liar.