Veracity said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Veracity said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Tigerlure said:
Quick question, was there any witness who saw the initial confrontation between Trayvon and George Zimmermann? I know witnesses said they saw Trayvon on top of GZ, but did they see who actually started the fight? |
No. No one witnessed Trayvon walking around the neighborhood outside of Zimmerman, the initial confrontation and no one saw who started the fight. No one witnessed the gun shot either.
The only other two people who know what happened are god and Trayvon outside of Zimmerman. This case is pointless to judge on such a high level at this point.
|
Go outside the evidence for a minute.
how does trayvon get on top? Zimmerman outweighs Him by 30 pounds.
zimmerman bardic ally describes being sucker punched and knocked down. Makes sense to me.
|
Thats zimmermans word. In the court of law a persons word without corroboration of a witness means very little, which is why they are looking for inconsistencies in the case.
If there is bias, what hes saying definitely makes sense to an individual. If someone witnessed him suckerpunch Zimmerman, then what you are saying has evidence behind it.
Trayvons fingers had bruising on them, which means he bruised himself which beating up Zimmerman: Fact. This is why they have a forensics witness on the stand. Of course shes being cross examined by the defense harshly because she was talked to because shes a prosecution witness.
This is probably why I was picked to be a juror even though I never wanted to be...I tend not to take sides but only focus on the important factors. I've pointed out the bias in my own family as well.
|
What does "go outside the evidence for a minute" mean to you?
You did not respond to anything I asked. Try again.
|
I cannot replay the events without being in the same area as the event. Any recreation without it is flawed. It was 1/4 on concrete and the rest on grass. The best possible evidence came from the Zimmerman video but as compelling as what he said was its only one persons side of the story. I cannot base a conclusion off of a defendents word without corroboration.
As for my personal experience from fighting, thirty pounds means very little outside of leverage and distribution of weight , but even weight distribution can be used against you if the person knows how to fight or defend themselves. What I think doesn't matter though in this case because we know nothing about the positioning, we don't have Trayvons word, no witnesses again agin only Zimmerman.
Regardless of all of these things Zimmermans lawyer is doing a hell of a job. At this point no one can prove anything, just beyond reasonable doubt at this point.
Either an innocent man is going to jail or justice isn't served for a kid who was shot. It's a flawed case.
Let me put it this way. Listen to Zimmermans best friends testimony and you will see exactly why this putting someone on the stand who isn't a first hand witness is pointless. Bless his heart, but he was essentially useless and potentially harmed Zimmerman because he didnt know exactly what he was saying (perhaps he should've brought the book he wrote about zimmerman with him.)
