George Zimmerman Trial

[S.T.A.G.E.]

silentdj151 said:

S.T.A.G.E. said:

silentdj151 said:

yes an assualt occurred, which Zimmerman started because he got out of his car and preceded to confront someone who was hiding in a bush.

We don't know if Zimmerman started it. There were no eyewitnesses. Both sides are incompetent. The only thing that can be done about this case is to find out whether it was murder or self defense and even then the case is still broken.

Ok let me put this as simple as I can: Zimmerman started the events that caused someone to die.

Only thing martin was doing that night was walking home from buying candy and tea

 

 

Yes...he started the ripple effect, but the parts that matter are unknown in a case without witnesses, cameras, etc. As I said that no longer matters anymore in the outcome of the case but yes he is to blame for the initial action (reaction? No clue). If he didnt follow Trayvon he would've walked home with his bag of skittles no matter how suspicious Zimmerman claiimed he was. Zimmerman was beaten up by viewers in the case early on because he wasn't in the right for following Trayvon in the first place, but as facts and testimony came in the cards were overturned. 

"Only thing martin was doing that night was walking home from buying candy and tea"

Sure, in the beginning but in the end the evidence shows he was out for chicklets with Zimmermans face. No one is innocent, but yes its undisputed that Zimmerman started the ripple effect of tension.

Let me put its this way. 

No matter who wins this case half the viewers will not happy.