enditall727 said:
Hmm.. Good comment This is what I came in here for. I wanted to find out the "truth".
So far it seems like Trayvon was walking home. Zimmerman started following him. Trayvon then turned around to confront him, words were exchanged, a scuffle broke out, Trayvon was getting the best of him them George shot him.
Damn this case is crazy!
Seems like Trayvons downfall was when he turned around to confront George. But George still started it by following Trayvon because that was the only reason why he turned around.
Seems like George only shot him because he was losing the scuffle.
George should've just left it alone and let the kid walk home and Trayvon should've kept walking instead of turning around |
This is how the moral of the story goes:
George Zimmerman should never have followed Trayvon and listened to the dispatch officer and trayvon should never have confronted him but rather just walked back to his parents house in the neighborhood.
This case is so broken that it they are taking testimony from people who weren't even on site. The most controversial cases that we've had in this country are the cases where there are no witnesses. Why might you ask? Because everyones bias comes into account and they need their biases to be fed on both sides. No one knows the truth and are looking for answers especially on hot button cases or racially charged cases. This case is no different than any of the others and no matter what the decision if Zimmerman goes free he will be a rich man. He will do exclusive interviews, movie deals and many other things.
