Barozi said:
MohammadBadir said:
Barozi said:
MohammadBadir said:
honestly, who the hell believed EA in the first place? if Frostbite 3 can run on the PS360, then why can't it on the Wii U which is more powerful? if Crysis 3 with the CryEngine 3 ran on the Wii U "beautifully" on the Wii U, why can't Frostbite 3 run on it?
|
ugh you don't get it either.
EA NEVER said that WiiU can't run Frostbite 3. That IS the lie that people have made up.
|
if they say the console can barely run FB2, what does one automatically assume for FB3?
|
First of all they never said that FB2 barely run on WiiU.
They said the results weren't too promising, which could mean a lot of things.
What obvious is however that it didn't run as great as on other platforms, but nothing that couldn't be fixed with putting more work into it and/or downgrading the games.
But as they said in article in the OP, it wouldn't be worth it for them, since the userbase is low, it would be too much work/investment for little (if any) profit, and they don't want their engine to look ugly.
FB3 is on top of that more scalable. You're mistakenly thinking that a new version automatically means that it's more demanding, which is not necessarily true or how is it possible that BF3 on PS360 looks better than BF:Bad Company on PS360 even though BF3 runs on FB2 and Bad Company on FB1 (while both having the same resolution and framerate) ?
Another example would be that CryEngine 3 is less demanding than CryEngine 2.
|
but isn't them deciding not to run FB3 on the Wii U because FB2 didn't have promising results a bit contradicting? XD
