Xbox One And Xbox 360 Games Win Big At E3

[Michael-5]

Goatseye said:

S.T.A.G.E. said:

Goatseye said:

 

It looks like MS is the only company that moneyhatts, not that I care.

I'll be more than happy to see Titanfall go to Son¥ platform after all this interest. It's good to see that Xbox is doing fine in terms of games, we won't make petitions or go up in arms in the interwebs don't worry.

MS needs to make their first parties draw people not just third parties. They screw it up for everyone when they do that. I played Gears of War and used to brag to all my friends who were PS3 about how great it was and they let me know that MS paid to keep it away from Sony. I was like man MS was screwed up for doing that, everyone who likes TPS should get their hands on this, especially if they were fans of Winback and Killswitch. I played all the exclusives and timed exclusives for third party they money hatted at the beginning of the gen.

So everybody should play Uncharted on Xbox right?

Do you know why MS and Xbox 360 were so loved by the devs and publishers? They didn't compete with them.

They gave them the system to put more games there without too much first party competition.

What's with the emphasis on exclusives anyways? To childishly brag about to other people that don't have Playstation?

If I want to play a game like Uncharted, I'll play Tomb Raider.

Heavy Rain, I'll play LA Noir.

Socom, I'll play COD.

What's the point of bragging about exclusives?

Why play second rate games when you can play the best on a Sony platform? Why settle for  an 87/100 game like Tomb Raider, when you can have a 96/100 game like Uncharted?

Plus what alternative is there for God of War? The Last of Us? LittleBigPlanet? Last I checked, there were only a handful of games which scored as well as The Last of Us, and not a single one of them was a 360 exclusive (3 were Wii exclusive though).

This is a silly arguement against owning a Playstation, especially now since the PS4 is $100 cheaper then the One. "Uh....I'll pay $100 more, for less games...exclusives don't matter."

sales2099 said:

Michael-5 said:

So I might have to wait 6 months to enjoy Titanfall (unless I buy it on 360), but I will enjoy it. One owners will miss out on a lot more games then PS4 owners (especially those with PC's who can play Fable, Halo, and every single Remedy game ever released, without owning an X-Box).

This ain't the 360 and MS seems actively invested in both 1st party and 3rd party exclusives. Even if they are timed, the hype and gamers would have moved on by then.If you wanna compare one on one, X1 would in theory offer a better games package then PS4. Both have great 1st party studios (Sony has more though), but MS is clearly more invested in 3rd party exclusives, both timed and actual. And they love getting Xbox games that share a PC version.

A PS4 gamer would need a PC to play what a X1 can play, essentially saying that PS4 can't stand up on its own. A X1 would have a winning combination of 1st/3rd party exclusives, and staying current with yearly 3rd party timed exclusives.

You can just own a gaming PC and "cheat", thus saying you don't need a X1. But then you'd be telling ppl that you need 2 platforms to do what 1 can do on its own.

How do you know the One won't be like the 360? The 360 started strong, and we didn't know that many of the "exclusives" were actually timed exclusives until part way into 2007, a few months after the PS3 released. I'll bet you, the One will follow in the same footsteps.

Hype, do you buy a game because of hype, or because of quality. If Hype > everything else, we would all be drinking mountain dew, eating doritos, and playing Halo 3.

---

As for the rest, what are you talking about? I'm saying PS4 owners don't need a One to play most of One's "exclusives." One can't stand up to PS4 because even with a PC, and a Wii U, you still can't play a lot of true Sony exclusives. Owning a PC is not cheating, most people have PC's, which can play modern video games, even One games (at lower settings).