How not to defend atheism

[Player1x3]

Jay520 said:

Player1x3 said:

Jay520 said:

Player1x3 said:

Jay520 said:
Atheism doesn't need to be defended.

Atheism is only the default based on which definition of it you subscribe to.

The definition I use based on my social experiences with the phenomenon is a belief that there is/are no god(s) rather than a lack of belief in god(s).

The subtle distinction, for my point of view, plays a major role in shaping attitudes and active discussions about the topic, to the extent that atheism doesn't really qualify as a null claim but rather an alternate positive claim.

Of course you know which definition is the right definition, I presume?

There is no right defenition, its all subjective

Well, one definition is more official than the others. Are you telling me we can just change definitions as we please?

Read the first sentence of my post again.