| killerzX said: Man, this is what i hate most about the pro-homosexual couples marriage croud. they are intentionally dishonest. They manpulate and twist the wording of the argument, by using terms like marriage equality. When they no full well, its not, its not equal marriage. there are still numerous forms of marriage that are still excluded, or never mentioned by this crowd. perhaps becuase it puts them in an uncomfortable position, it exposes the hypocrasy, or they only selectively care about the type of "marriage equality. i wonder if this ruling will have any ramifacations on other forms of marriage, like polygamous, incest, mom marrying son, marrying dad, and cousin. 3 guys and 15 wives. brother sister, what have you. Maybe now there'll be a push to lower the age of consent, why do people discriminate against the pediphile that wants to marry that 16 year old. they love each other! why 18, why not 17, 16, 15 or even 12. most people (especially girls have reached puberty by that point).
for the record i am neither for nor against gay couples marriage. im for the government getting out of marriage all together. |
Hey, going to have to repeat myself a bit here, but let me explain. Those are completely separate things. I have no idea what you would called that, but it is not making equal both genders the ability to marry either gender.
Let's say Billy and Kelly go in for a marriage license. They all check through as available and such, but ops, the only thing that would stop their marriage in California yesterday was their gender. If they are male-female they could get married, but if female-female yesterday they could not. Now that single barrier of gender can no longer determined their ability to wed each other.
The reason is called Marriage Equality, because it grants equal marriage rights to both genders.
A man could marry a man or a woman, and visa versa. Polygamy, Incest, age of consent, etc have nothing to do with Marriage Equality.







