| Screamapillar said: I think it's sad that "marriage equality" seems to only apply to homosexuals. What about a man who wants more than one wife, or a woman who wants more than one husband? Why are they denied the same privileges, if most of us seem to be in agreement that homosexuals ought to be lawfully allowed to marry? |
Oh, those are completely separate things. Please see my other post.
Ah, most significant rights of marriage, a whole 1,000+ plus only come from the Federal Government. That is why it has to be a federal case.
Let's say Billy and Kelly go in for a marriage license. They all check through as available and such, but ops, the only thing that would stop their marriage in California yesterday was their gender. If they are male-female they could get married, but if female-female yesterday they could not. Now that single barrier of gender can no longer determined their ability to wed each other.
The reason is called Marriage Equality, because it grants equal marriage rights to both genders.
A man could marry a man or a woman, and visa versa.







