darendt said:
Thats the key right there. People dont know what they are getting for that money. And thats where M$ gets its suckers from. People that bought the HDD less 360, people who bought one in general. The PS3 has a ton more features both hardware and functionality. The 360 selld all of its "extras" for an insane amount of money and forces you to buy there own stuff. The PS3 has all of those features built in for a fraction of what you would pay getting it with a 360. I think if everyone knew it had a blu-ray drive, up-converted PS1,PS2 and DVDs, was a location free player, allows music and video streaming from your PC, allowed you to increase the size of the HDD to whatever size you want using whatever HDD you wan, could use Blu-tooth peripherals and use the PSP as a remote, hell play PS1 games on your PSP from anywhere in the world. They would realize that the PS3 was a GREAT DEAL. The 360 gets you in cheap, but steals your wallet once you open it. |
You are assuming that everyone would want all those features with the 360, which isn't true. The thing is that people still see gaming systems as little more than, well, gaming systems. Thus having more games is what attracts people. $200 more, with fewer stellar games (upcoming or already here), just doesn't seem that attractive to people, fair or not.
A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.
Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs








