| badgenome said: Why should states that have had some rather shameful episodes in their history (and frankly, which states don't?) suffer being treated as pariahs forever based on outdated data? Surely the Supreme Court would want to drag the federal government into this century by stopping this type of discrimination. Who is to say which state is more racist? Why is Texas or South Carlolina racist forever because of laws that were eradicated half a century ago while New York City maintains a sterling reputation as an enlighted liberal bastion despite its horrendously racist stop and frisk policies and its warrantless wiretapping of mosques... in New Jersey? |
Well an easy example that was on TV was that some elderly black woman now needed to show her birth certifcate.. Which she didn't have to use before when voting and will probably be a hard time to find for her cause her parents didn't registered her cause of the racism back in the 1950's... Just because the laws have changed by now doesn't mean don't still have an affect on people nowadays..
Face the future.. Gamecenter ID: nikkom_nl (oh no he didn't!!)
