By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
badgenome said:

Basically, the Court ruled that what happened in a state's history can't be used in perpetuity to treat it differently from other states. All it means is that the Justice Department has to prove in court that a law is actually disenfranchising people rather than holding a veto over certain state's rights to pass laws as they have done for the last ~50 years.

Is that a good or bad thing?