MTZehvor said:
Certainly, but we hardly even know how much the NSA's efforts would even begin to stem the tide of terrorism. According to them, their efforts stopped "dozens" of different terrorist attacks last year. But how many is dozens? How many of these attacks would have been preventable through other means? Who are these supposed terrorists to begin with, and when were they put on trial? Where is any credible evidence that proves these figures to begin with? All that we have is the NSA's word that they've stopped "dozens" of terrorist attacks. Before an entire nation submits itself to secret government wiretapping that has the potential to be horribly abused, I would like a bit more concrete evidence that shows that this wiretapping actually prevents acts of terrorism, and if it does, how many attacks it prevents would be crucial as well. |
Yes it's hard to evaluate the results. It relies a lot on trust, how much you trust your elected politicians and the government, and their efficiency and honesty.
But I believe they do have concrete results, CIA and NSA that is.
Recently I saw an Israeli documentary about the Shin Bet, the Israeli secret service responsible for security on the occcupied territories, and this was a documentary critical towards the organization and its methods, but it became very clear that Shin Bet has stopped several terrorist attacks and terrorist leaders. Naturally they used traditional secret service methods such as under-cover agents, interrogations and whatnot, but surveillance was one important method out of many.







