| fkusumot said: Okay. It's funny that mention the O.J. case since Dr. Baden was also one of the "experts" in that case. He testified for the defense, for O.J., in the civil case that O.J. lost. The stuff you posted above seems "likely" to me, but... I really want to know why the Committee thought it was "probable" that there was a conspiracy. I haven't looked it up in awhile but I think the records become public in 2029. Hopefully I'll still be young enough then not to have died from old age. |
That's the thing, Baden showed an impossibility for OJ to commit both murders, and how the LA forensics office heavily botched the whole case. He didn't say that OJ didn't do it, nor did he say that he did it, just that there was too much tampering with the evidence.
That's why OJ was acquitted: You don't get sentenced because a person was most likely to commit the crime, you sentence the person because the evidence pinpoints the person actually carried out the deed.
Also, the Committee you mention did its work in 1978, whereas there has been continuing work on the subject conducted in regards to the fourth shot, which does make the Committee seem wrong with their conspiracy allegations.
