| fkusumot said: Actually, no. That little snippet does not support your case if you think that it was not a conspiracy. If you think that it was a lone gunman and a conspiracy you have some cognitive dissonance going on. Or maybe I've misunderstood you? |
Actually, yes.
I said Lee could have done the job, to which you couldn't grasp.
However, that snippet, along with what I showed, just proves that much more that Oswald was solely responsible for the death.
There were three shots fired that everyone, as well as evidence backing it up, that Oswald fired three shots:
1.) The missed shot;
2.) This is the one that people get most of their conspiracy theories from: The hole in the back of Kennedy was not the entry wound, rather the exit wound. That's what Baden laid to rest, meaning Oswald was responsible for that shot as well;
3.) The fatal shot, which can't be argued, came from Oswald as well.
Now if there were another gunman, well he most certainly didn't play that much of a crucial or vital role. The only thing that would pinpoint towards another gunman is the "fourth shot," which people believe also missed JFK.
However, I don't think there was another gunman, and even your Wikipedia article states that it is "probable" and that it really isn't that impossible, but it doesn't say it's concrete.
That's like scientific data saying it's probable that OJ committed both murders, or it's probable that OJ and another culprit took part in the murders.
Basically what I'm trying to say is there was no fourth shot.
