fordy said:
Do I want to know why Sony got a standing ovation and not Microsoft? Not really. Do you know why? Because large, unruly mobs generally tend to only have one side of the story, with a very few controlling those emotions either with an agenda or just plain ignorant themselves. I'll hand it to Sony on one thing only: they know how to send large, unruly mobs to their competitors over half-truths. And before you start with your whole "you're only trying to make Microsoft look better" crap, keep in mind that I was in the exact same mindset as you until yesterday. What changed? I heard the other side of the argument and motives made a whole lot more sense, unlike this illogical portrayal of Microsoft being these big, shady people who just love to screw people over that other people will have you try to think... |
DRM was not going to enhance anything, so I dont know what you're going on about. DRM is Digital Rights Management....which only protects Microsoft, EA and other participating third parties. They were throwing you a bone with glorified demos or "sharing" for taking rights away from you in the family plan.
As for the E3 show, yes...it was unruly, biased mobs. No, they were reporters, E3 shows at majorly attended by reporters and fans aren't really allowed. They are allowed to play the games and roam around where they are given access but thats it. These are reporters whom are gamers themselves and can afford their games and tend to own all of the consoles so they can review them and Sony caused them to give a standing ovation just by doing as they asked. Why? Ever heard the marketing say....."The market always wins?" Yes. Thats how it should always be or else your business is a sham from the start.
I read the other side of the argument, I know the motives and their motives were not good enough to risk their public perception just to force the people kicking and screaming into something they'll probably accept six to ten years from now. We all know all digital is coming, we're just not ready for that.