By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
kitler53 said:

"magine a family where a Dad and his two sons want to play Halo against each other. With the Xbox One, they would only need one copy of Halo, now with the changed rules, they need to buy three."

confirmed false. he misunderstands what MS said.

"Because every single game, physical or digital, would be tied to an account, publishers couldcreate a hub to sell and resell the games digitally"

nothing is preventing that from still happening. this is in no way tied the the current or previous policy.

"YOU: New games could then be cheaper. Why? Publishers KNOW that they will not make money on resold games, so they charge more to you, the first buyer."

a point completely and utter obliterated by his incorrect notion of how game sharing worked in top quote and further nullified from MS's official statement that new games cost $60.

"You also would have started getting a better return on your “used” games—because a license does not have to be resold at a diminished rate."

if publishers get a cut of used game sales someone is paying for it. directly or indirectly the value to the consumer would be diminished.

"There is something ironic about people going online to complain about the 24-hr check on the Xbox One. "

there is nothing ironic in standing up for my consumer rights.


Funny how this guys calls us idiots meanwhile he can't even get his facts straight, lol!



iPhone = Great gaming device. Don't agree? Who cares, because you're wrong.

Currently playing:

Final Fantasy VI (iOS), Final Fantasy: Record Keeper (iOS) & Dragon Quest V (iOS)     

    

Got a retro room? Post it here!