Seece said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Seece said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
Dont trust them, If it was Sony doing this I would've switched to Microsoft like I did earlier this gen. Whats the point of being a blind sheep? I mean yes halo is awesome but its one game and Gears isnt guaranteed. The majority of gamers buy multiplats anyway, so subtleties between these two consoles whom are both so similar are what maks or breaks the sales depending on where they are.
|
And I'll say what I said in the other thread, you have no idea what has been talked about behind the scenes and if it was discussed why Sony didn't go ahead. Don't for a second think "Oh but the poor gamers" popped into Sony's heads. Paywall and "DRM up to third party's" says hello. Even when I left here you were so angry toward MS and you still are, I dunno if you would have switched honestly. But lets not make this personal, the fact of the matter is you can't trust Sony anymore than you can MS.
|
Goord lord man, Yoshida said DRM was never thought about...therefore it was never on the table to be brought up. They were leaving the PS4 the same way as the PS3 in that respect.
|
Well why on earth would they say differently? You did see E3 right? How they positioned themselves as gamers saviour and mocked MS/DRM ect?
I can well believe they didn't have any plans on it, but I can also well believe they did. people are (in some cases rightfully) being told not to trust and put their faith in MS and I see Sony no differently, whatsoever. The only gaming company I trust to stand by their values because it actually means a thing to them, is Nintendo.
|
Sony never changed their tone once. I showed the guy the link, read it. Sony essentially was the savior, because if they had put DRM in their console all the people who complained would be fucked. They would have no choice between the HD twins. The two pllars of next gen gaming would've locked up DRM. Sony all eyes on the third parties and EA stepped back into the shadows.
