Should Nintendo bring back the Wii-style marketing?

[S.T.A.G.E.]

happydolphin said:

S.T.A.G.E. said:

There is a market for fads...but thats just what a fad is...a popular style, dance, tech or product thats popularity is only meant to last a short period of time. The Wii lasted longer than the Kinect because Nintendo found ways to keep it fresh for four years and then dropped proper support after Wii Fit.

Im not a fanboy of Sony...I dont give a crap about the Wonderbook so don't expect me to defend it. I could care less about any of the motion control devices let alone the Vita. I am just stating that the Move was the more well thought out piece of tech and it took a generation and a half of development to figure out how to make it work properly.

Again, too early to call anything a fad. Your arguments are falling from under your feet. First you say "People who call Pokemon a fad after the duration of its success are essentially clueless.", I'm saying you're just as clueless as them, and now you're telling me there is a market for fads.

Nintendo didn't find a way to keep it fresh, any new input control cannot survive without some games to show their value. The same could be said about the analog stick or any other form of input presented so far.

You might not be a Sony fanboy but you most certainly are biased. You claim that the Move is the only one to be able to prove its worth over time thus making it not a fad, and claiming that the Wiimote+ and Kinect don't have that honor. That's heavily biased. Even if the move is more precise it doesn't change the fact that the Motion+ is very precise, and has its advantages over the move as well (can be played in a dark room, doesn't require as much calibration, much better price proposition).

Ok if I am so clueless....why isnt the Wii U attaining the same success as the Wii? Its Obvious as to why. Answer the question. I know why.